Archaeologist’s excavation of Georgia town site indicated violent ethnic change around 1375 AD
A long term research project is analyzing all available archaeological reports for the entire Chattahoochee-Flint-Apalachicola River System. Sandtown (9FU1) adjacent Sweet Potato (9FU14) and the Vandiver Village Site (9DO1) were the only three Native American town sites on the Chattahoochee River in Metro Atlanta that have been fully excavated by professional archaeologists. As stated earlier in POOF articles, information obtained at these sites has generally been left out of contemporary archaeological literature, evidently because it conflicts with current orthodoxies.
In 1939, archaeologist Robert Wauchope excavated the Sandtown Site (9FU1) on the Chattahoochee River. At the time, all of this section of the Chattahoochee Valley was in a natural or agricultural state. He found the entire two mile long corridor littered with potsherds and stone tools, dating from around 1000 BC to the 1700s. They were mixed together by the actions of floods.
The floodplain was covered with a layer of sand and silt, deposited by floods. Mixed in with this alluvial layer were Native American artifacts spanning 2,800 years of occupation. There were also items of European manufacture that were typical of the 1700s and early 1800s. Wauchope believed that the artifacts were washed from mounds and upper elevations in the massive community site.
When Wauchope’s team cut trenches into the soil beneath the alluvial deposit, they found evidence of an almost continuous occupation of the town site from the Woodland Period. In addition to Swift Creek pottery (c. 200 AD -600 AD) he also found some Weeden Island pottery that is normally typical of northern Florida and southwestern Georgia during the Woodland Period.
Occupation of the town site was most extensive during the Mississippian (Southeastern Ceremonial) Culture (900 AD – 1600 AD). From around 900 AD to 1375 AD the artifacts in the town were identical to those at Etowah Mounds, about 30 miles to the north, but he found a stark cultural break between the Middle and Late Mississippian Periods. At this break was a dense layer of charcoal covering the entire village, but deepest at the locations of buildings.
Over the charcoal layer, new occupants arrived, who placed their houses and mounds at different locations. They made Lamar Style pottery, which developed from the Etowah Style pottery, but was different. Wauchope felt that the discontinuance of ancient structures, such as mounds, indicated that the new occupants were a different ethnic group with no allegiance to the past.
Arthur Kelly’s research confirms Wauchope’s findings
In 1968 and 1969, the famous archaeologist, Arthur Kelly supervised excavations at Sandtown and adjacent 9FU14. POOF will have a separate article on 9FU14. He also encountered the charcoal layer, but it reminded him of what he had seen eight years earlier at the Chauga Site (38OC1) at the headwaters of the Savannah River.
The Chauga Site was settled by people, who made pottery identical to that which Kelly had found at the lower levels of the Lamar Village in Ocmulgee National Monument and Etowah Mounds. He also found a dense layer of charcoal between the Middle and Late Mississippian Periods at Chauga, followed by mounds in different orientations and new styles of houses associated with the Proto-Creek Lamar Culture. The Lamar Culture was named after the style of pottery found at the newer levels of the Lamar Village, which evidently also experienced a cultural change, but not necessarily a violent one.
Note: The article in Wikipedia on Chauga is quite inaccurate and seems to be based on the recollection by some anthropology student of a professor’s lecture, not the actual archaeological report. There are eight mounds on the site, not one, as stated in Wikipedia. Dr. Kelly did not find any evidence of Cherokee occupation. The Creek occupants of the village abandoned it after it was burned by the Cherokees around 1700 AD at the same time that nearby Lamar Culture (Proto-Creek) town of Tugaloo was burned. A small section of Tugaloo was resettled a few years later by a primitive people, living in small round huts . . . shown on 18th century maps as the Hogeloge Uchee from Tennessee. Chauga was never resettled.
Who burned Sandtown and Chauga?
Wauchope and Kelly did not speculate on the identity of the ethnic group that destroyed Sandtown around 1375 AD. The victors were obviously direct ancestors of the Colonial Period members of the Creek Confederacy. There is a continuance of pottery styles from 1375 AD to the 1700s. Since Lamar Style pottery evolved from Etowah-Ichesi style pottery, it can be presumed that both the victors and vanquished were Muskogeans.
The most likely candidate for the vanquished are the Itsate Creeks, who by the late 1600s had been pushed into the Northeast Georgia Mountains and vicinity of Macon, GA. Between 900 AD and 1375 AD, principal mounds in the Creek Homeland faced the sunset of the Winter Solstice, which is the beginning of the Maya calendar. After 1375 AD the principal mounds were oriented to the Summer Solstice, the beginning of the Creek and Tamaulte Calendars.
My family was definitely Itsate (Hitchiti) Creek. In my Northeast Georgia family’s lore there was a vague memory of a war between the “Creeks” and the “Muskogees”. The Muskogees were remembered as aggressive, warlike enemies of the Creeks, whose eastward invasion was blocked in a bloody battle by an alliance of Creeks and Uchee in eastern Georgia and western South Carolina. After that time, the enemies “buried their hatchets” and formed the Creek Confederacy. I did not realize that the Muskogees were also Creek Indians until I was in my early 20s.
The most likely candidates for the victors are the Apalache, whose kingdom evolved into the Creek Confederacy during the early 1700s. The Cowetas told officials in Savannah in 1735 that their alternate name was Palache (ie Apalache).
Variants of Lamar Style pottery can be found from Southwestern Virginia to the Florida Panhandle. In 1653, the Paracusi-te (High King) of Apalache told Richard Briggstock that his kingdom once stretched from SW Virginia to the Gulf of Mexico. [Rae & Thornton (2013): The Apalache Chronicles].
Another explanation also comes from the High King of Apalache. He told Briggstock that a predatory hunter-gatherer people that he called the Kofitachete (Offspring of Mixed Ethnicity People) were allowed to settle near an Apalache province. Without warning the Kofitachete attacked and burned many Apalache towns. A long, bloody war ensued before the Koftiachete were finally crushed.
This evidence of massive warfare and stark cultural change around 1375 AD suggests that the Creek Confederacy is actually much older than the Colonial Period. Perhaps cultural memories that we retain and thought to date from the 1600s, actually date from the 1300s.
The truth is out there somewhere!
Latest posts by Richard Thornton (see all)
- News: Canadian archaeologists discover ancient hydroponic farm for growing arrowroot - January 16, 2019
- Astonishing connections between Teotihuacan and Creek Religion - January 13, 2019
- The Mesoamerican-Polynesian Connection . . . many questions - January 12, 2019
- Some days turn out to be more important than others! - January 8, 2019
- A Gathering of the People . . . June 21-23, 2019 . . . The Nacoochee Valley - January 7, 2019