Etowah’s Great Mound originally looked very different than today!
It’s a dirty little secret! What everyone thinks is the shape of the Great Mound at Etowah is entirely wrong. The Etowah that Smithsonian Institute archaeologists encountered in the 1880s has been extensively altered in the decades before the Civil War and a flood in 1886.
Historic preservation architects are trained to do meticulous research before preparing restoration drawings or in this case, construction of a massive town model that is eight feet long and six feet wide. I was working on a project that would be on public display long after I was in heaven. Because of the fact that some of my ancestors could have helped build these structures , there was even more incentive for perfection . . . but ultimately, I screwed up.
No one has ever caught the mistake, because they made the same assumption as me . . . that the appearance of the mounds seen in 1884 by Cyrus Thomas and John Rogan of the Smithsonian Institute were the result of modest erosion on earthen structures, which were abandoned around 1600 AD. We were oh so wrong.
Just to be certain, I read and re-read the accounts of Etowah Mounds by pioneer archaeologist, Charles C. Jones, Jr. The landmark book on Southeastern archaeology by Jones was published in 1873, but he had actually studied Etowah just before the Civil War. Jones paid a civil engineer to prepare a site plan of Etowah. It was the most accurate portrayal of the site before the late 20th century. It also included mounds that were covered by silt or destroyed in the Great Flood of 1886. There were actually 18 mounds on both sides of the Etowah River.
The engineer’s site plan showed bulges on the west, north and south sides of the great mound and a somewhat different appearance to the south ramp on the mound. I assumed that the bulges were mistakes, since “they didn’t make sense.” However, otherwise, my model above matches Jone’s drawings, not what you see today. The bottom 15 feet of the mound are concealed by silt deposited in the 1886 flood. The flood also washed away about 20 feet of the soil of the original town, closer to the river.
The big surprise
While writing a Native American history of the Etowah Valley for Access Genealogy in 2014, a stumbled upon an extraordinary fact that has been completely ignored by Southeastern archaeologists for the past 155 years. The Etowah Mounds site was visited and measured by Yale University Natural Science professor, Elias Cornelius in 1818. At the time, the entire village site was covered in trees from 100 to 40 years old. The three Cherokee men, who accompanied him to the ruins said that Cherokees had never lived there because it was haunted, when they arrived in the region about 25 years earlier.
The mound had a very different shape than either in 1860 or today. As can be seen below, it had three ramps and an additional level on top, which was ROUND. Furthermore, Cornelius explored what appeared to be a basement to the last temple, which had tunnel access from the north and south. The largest mound at Troyville Mounds in northern Louisiana also had a round mound on top.
I contacted a former full time ranger at Etowah Mounds to see if he knew about the original shape of Mound A. He told me that he had never seen the drawings by Professor Cornelius, but that the staff had known for some time that the Tumlin family, owners of the property from the 1830s to 1955, had charged $200 a day to art collectors to excavate at will on the archaeological site from the 1830s until the 1870s. The ramp that Jones saw and that is even larger today, was a construction ramp built by laborers working for the various people, who rented the archaeological zone by the day.
There is no telling what was taken out of that mound. However, this might explain the numerous statues that are floating around the United States, which supposedly came from Etowah Mounds.
Between the concealed 15 feet at the bottom and the 20+ feet cut off the top during the 1800s, a surprising fact is revealed. Etowah Mound A was originally about 110 feet high or the same height as Monks Mound at Cahokia. However, it was far better engineered. Even today, Mound A has some of the steepest slopes of any Native American mound. On the other hand, Monks Mound has been chronically plagued by subsidence.
Learn something every day!
Latest posts by Richard Thornton (see all)
- Geneticists identify probable microbe that killed 80% of Mexico’s population - January 17, 2018
- How did Tobesofkee Creek get its name? - January 16, 2018
- A Kanza town on the Ocmulgee River in Georgia - January 15, 2018
- OMG! Meredith Emerson was a US Forest Service decoy when kidnapped and beheaded - January 15, 2018
- Women . . . how to avoid being a victim of male predators - January 14, 2018