Map: South American and Caribbean Peoples in the Southeast (1540 AD)
Readers will probably notice that I labeled the Florida Apalachee . . . Southern Arawaks. In 1658, French ethnographer, Charles de Rochefort, stated that the Apalache of North Georgia established a colony among the people in the Florida Panhandle, but that the people in that region did not call themselves Apalachee and they were Southern Arawaks from Peru. He said that the Spanish had given these people the name, without asking them what they called themselves! Indeed, all but one of the Florida “Apalachee” towns have Southern Arawak names . . . including their capital. The one exception is Apalachen (Apalaches) which happens to be the colony that the Georgia Apalache established.
Nevertheless, Florida academicians have created an imaginary language called Southern Muskogean and label the Florida Apalachee as being Muskogean . . . aka Creek Indians. Here is the reason for the mistake . . . other than the fact that the Florida academicians did not respect their elders . . . aka Charles de Rochefort. A band of Tamale Creeks on the Upper Altamaha River converted to Catholicism. They were expelled from their province and so the Spanish established a mission station for them on the GA-FL line, south of Valdosta. The friar assigned to them wrote a glossary of their words and called it Apalache. If Florida anthropologists had gone to the trouble to translate the Florida Apalachee village and personal names, they would have realized what was going on.
Latest posts by Richard Thornton (see all)
- Youtube . . . The Discovery of Fort San Mateo - March 23, 2018
- Time passes so quickly when you are having fun! - March 22, 2018
- Did you know that there were pottery kilns near Etowah Mounds? - March 21, 2018
- Post Script . . . Why Native Americans should monitor descriptions of colonial history - March 20, 2018
- This politicized TV documentary only told part of the story - March 19, 2018