Select Page

One “Lost” Migration Legend Puts White Men on the South Atlantic Coast Before Columbus

One “Lost” Migration Legend Puts White Men on the South Atlantic Coast Before Columbus

There were actually four Creek migration legends found in the box at Lambeth Palace that was discovered in April 2015 . . . plus several other eyewitness accounts of the Southeast’s Native Americans in the early 1730s. THE Migration Legend was by far the longest and also described the Kaushete’s full journey from Mexico to the Lower Southeast.

However, one of the other legends is specifically about the band of Kaushete (Cusseta) who ended up where Fort Benning, GA is today. It provides details of events after the Kaushete settled on the Chattahoochee River, and they are VERY different than what both the history books and most Southeastern Native Americans think their history was.

First, we will look at three other migration legends that seem to collaborate the version from the Chattahoochee Kaushete. Two are from “the box” and the other is from Uncle Hal.

The Itsate (Hitchiti) Migration Legend states that their ancestors came from the south over water. When they got to North America, they first settled near a great lake. This suggests that they were the people or one of the peoples involved in the advanced indigenous culture near Lake Okeechobee in Southern Florida. However, before 1700, the Okefenokee Swamp in southeastern Georgia, was also a lake. It had islands in it. Archaeologists have counted at least 74 mounds on and adjacent to the Okefenokee Swamp.

The Itsate next moved north to an area where reeds grew. That sounds like the Everglades, but could also be the vast tidal marshes on the coast of Georgia. They finally ended up where Savannah is now. From there they penetrated inland.

The Apalache Migration Legend says that they first landed in North America in the vicinity on the Georgia Coast. They then moved inland along the Altamaha River, where they developed their distinct culture around the banks of Lake Tama, south of Macon. High King Chikili said “Our first capital was where Savannah is today. Our first emperor is buried in a tomb near Savannah.” Was he talking about the Apalache or the Creek Confederacy?

Eastern Creeks: My grandmother and Uncle Hal told me a legend about time period in Northeast Georgia, immediately prior to the settlement of Charleston. We were Itsate and Uchee, so our mother towns were Parasikora (Palachicola) and the big mound complex near Elberton, GA. Uncle Hal also told me that while he was living in Chester, SC he heard exactly the same legend from South Carolina Creeks. There must be something to it.

According to our family lore, the “Creeks” once occupied most of Georgia, Western North Carolina and Eastern Tennessee. We were the big time mound builders. Then, the Muskogees began invading the Creek Heartland from the west, winning battle after battle against individual provinces. The Creeks in eastern Georgia and South Carolina formed an alliance and made a last ditch stand somewhere. There were terrible losses, but the Muskogees could advance nor further. At that point all the provinces “buried the hatchet” and formed the Creek Confederacy.

That’s right! Until I was in my early 20s, I did not realize that Muskogees were Creeks.

The Chattahoochee-Kaushete (Cussetaw) Migration Legend

Both versions of the Kaushete Migration share some common sub-stories and terminology. For example, the indigenous people of Georgia and western North Carolina are called “flat heads.” In other words, they practiced forehead deformation like the Mayas. The flatheads are skilled archers, whereas the Kaushete do not know how to use a bow. This is important, because it pushes the time back to much earlier than the Colonial Period.

The original People of One Fire (Creek Confederacy) in the Highland version had four members – Kaushete, Chickasaw, Alabama and Apika. The Chattahoochee Migration Legend had three original members – the Kaushete, Chickasaw and Koweta.

The Highland Migration Legend tells us that the Kaushe or Kusa were not the same people as the Muskogeans. Kaushe-te (Kusa People) got that name because of becoming vassals of the Kaushe. Presumably, the Kaushe or Kusa were the same people as the Kusabo on the South Carolina Coast. Kaushebo means “Strong People” in the Panoan Languages of eastern Peru. Note that Alechua (later Alec) is the word used for a medicine man. This is derived from the Alecmani on the Georgia Coast.

Here is a portion of the Chattahoochee version of the Migration Legend (original spelling):

“This being done, they commenced their settlements on Coosau and Tallapoosau, and crossing the falls of Tallapoosa above Tuckabatchee, they visited the Chattohochee, and found a
race of people with flat heads, in possession of the mounds in the Cussetaw Old Fields. (Fort Benning) These people used bows and arrows, with strings made of sinews.”

“The great physic makers, (Aulechualgee,) sent some rats in the night time, which gnawed the strings, and in the morning, they attacked and defeated the flats. They crossed the river at the island,
near the mound, and took possession of the country. After this, they spread out eastwardly, to Ocheesehatche, (Ocmulgee,) Oconee, Ogeechee, Chikili-talofa-hatchee, (Savannah,) called sometimes Sauvanogee, the name for Shaw-a-nee. They met white people on the seacoast, who drove them back to their present situation.*

*This means that the Muskogee-speaking Creeks were driven west of the Ocmulgee River by white men during a period when they did not have bows. They were skilled archers when Charleston was settled.

“Cussetaw and Chickasaw consider themselves as People of One Fire, (tote-kit-caw- humkoce,) from the earliest account of their origin. Cussetaw appointed the first Micco for them, directed him to sit down in the big Savanna, where they now are, and govern them. Some of the Chickasaws straggled off and settled near Augusta, from whence they returned and sat down near Cussetaw, and thence back to their nation. Cussetaw and Chickasaw have remained friends ever since their first acquaintance.”

“During the late war between the Creeks and Chickasaws, the Cussetaw refused to aid the Creeks. They retained her long established friendship with the Chickasaws. When the Creek Confederacy offered to make peace, their offers were rejected, till Cussetaw interposed their good offices. These had the desired effect, and produced peace.”

Possible chronology

Around 1300 AD, the Kaushe or Kusa established their first village in Northwest Georgia where New Echota is today. The Cherokees intentionally chose the location of the Upper Creek Mother Town for their capital. This would suggest that the ancestors of the Kaushete (Cusstaw) arrived on the the Tallapoosa River around 1200 AD and Chattahoochee River about 1250 AD – destroying the Mesoamerican culture around present day Columbus. They probably settled in southeastern Tennessee a little later and in southeastern Tennessee even later. Until they arrived in Southeastern Tennessee, they would have not called themselves the Kaushete. Their Mexican name has apparently been lost.

The Dallas Culture in eastern Tennessee, which included both the Kaushete and Apike (Abieka), began around 1350 AD. The invasion of Dallas Culture People into the Hiwassee Valley of western North Carolina began around 1400 AD. This corresponds exactly to the Highland Kaushete-Cussetaw Migration Legend.

In contrast, North Carolina archaeologists are now calling this appearance of the Dallas Culture – the Pisgah Culture . . . the arrival of the Cherokees . . . even though large, thoroughly planned towns and Mesoamerican style houses were abandoned in the early 1600s (corresponding to the arrival of the Sephardic colonists.) Around 1700, crude round huts in unplanned hamlets were built on top of the abandoned Muskogean towns. These are obviously the ancestors of the Cherokees.

There was a mass-abandonment of the Middle Savannah River Valley and a broad swath from there to Charleston Bay around 1400 AD. I think this was caused by the “Muskogee Invasion” that was vaguely remembered in my mother’s family lore. That would put the confrontation between the proto-Muskogees and “white men on the coast” in the 1400s or early 1500s. There were no Spaniards or Frenchmen in the Coastal Plain at that time.

What we are left with is the possibility that the Gaelic-speaking Duhare on the South Atlantic Coast, mentioned by Spanish slave raiders, Francisco Gordillo and Pedro de Quejo in 1521 were the white men, who drove the Muskogee-speakers back west again.

jean-ribaultOf course, this interpretation of the migration legends might seem a bit speculative, but those same batch of documents found at Lambeth Palace also contained a cultural memory of the founding by the French of Charlesfort at Port Royal Sound. Tamachichi (Tomochichi) told James Oglethorpe, the leader of the Georgia Colony that a Frenchman with a large red beard, had commanded a barque, which sailed up the Savannah River to the capital of Palachicola, which the French called Chicola.

That visit to Chicola is mentioned in the memoir of Captain René de Laudonnière, Commander of Fort Caroline. He said that the town and province that the French called Chicola, was the same place that the Spanish called Chicora.  Clearly, neither the French nor the Spanish were living on the coast when the Muskogees found the coast occupied by hostile white men.

The Truth is Out There Somewhere

The following two tabs change content below.
Richard Thornton is a professional architect, city planner, author and museum exhibit designer-builder. He is today considered one of the nation’s leading experts on the Southeastern Indians. However, that was not always the case. While at Georgia Tech Richard was the first winner of the Barrett Fellowship, which enabled him to study Mesoamerican architecture and culture in Mexico under the auspices of the Institutio Nacional de Antropoligia e Historia. Dr. Roman Piňa-Chan, the famous archaeologist and director of the Museo Nacional de Antropologia, was his fellowship coordinator. For decades afterward, he lectured at universities and professional societies around the Southeast on Mesoamerican architecture, while knowing very little about his own Creek heritage. Then he was hired to carry out projects for the Muscogee-Creek Nation in Oklahoma. The rest is history.Richard is the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer for the KVWETV (Coweta) Creek Tribe and a member of the Perdido Bay Creek Tribe. In 2009 he was the architect for Oklahoma’s Trail of Tears Memorial at Council Oak Park in Tulsa. He is the president of the Apalache Foundation, which is sponsoring research into the advanced indigenous societies of the Lower Southeast.

4 Comments

  1. contact@jonathanrex.com'

    There is a possibility that the story has roots in an encounter with Vikings. The Vikings established a permanent presence in Greenland sometime around the 10th Century and remained there for about 500-600 years. They regularly gathered timber all along the Northeast and had temporary camps set up in the region. That would place your oral tradition within that timeframe.

    Side note: There does appear to have been an interaction between the Five Nations who formed the Iroquois Confederacy and Vikings. The word sachem refers to a council or gathering with the Iroquois. In all Nordic and many Slavic countries the word Sejem (pronounced say-yem) means the same thing. The word likely came from Vikings who regularly raided east into Slavic lands. The Iroquois longhouse is also too similar to the Viking longhouse to ignore the possibility of some cultural exchange. It is necessary to note also that mounds began appearing in Central and Eastern Europe between 100-1000AD which suggests either Native people were being taken back as captives and built them or Nordic people were taking what they saw in Vinland (North America) back with them and it spread among Slavs. It is also possible Slavic slaves taken by Vikings to Vinland later made their way back to Slavic lands and took the mound tradition back with them. The Russians call them Kurgans.

    Reply
  2. contact@jonathanrex.com'

    The Vikings were building mounds as far back as 1000 BC when no others in Europe or Asia seemed to be creating them. What is interesting about this is that the Vikings in the 1st Century AD only went West because they had ancient stories of great lands across the sea. It’s not unlikely that there was ancient interactions between the Norse and the Native Americans. The Vikings already had a name for the people of Vinland (North America). They called the people Skraeglings (Wretched Ones). Their ancient tales from the BC period claimed the Skraeglings were vicious warriors (they must have been for Vikings to fear them). It was said that they cannibalized their victims in a confrontation and delivered the bones of the eaten Vikings to their enemies who chose to leave after and never returned (until the Vikings set out to see if the stories were true). These stories, of course, could be myths but even according to the Iroquois story the people practiced ritual cannibalism before the Peacemaker brought them together and ended the practice. Mound Pyramids are all over Brazil which date as far back ad 5,000 years. So it can be certain Native Americans didn’t get mounds from Vikings but was likely the other way around.

    Ancient Egyptian mummies have also been found to have had residue from cocaine and tobacco in their tombs (impossible unless Egyptians at some point were crossing the Atlantic and trading with the Olmecs or those before them. Pre-Columbian transatlantic and pacific trade is a fact. Asian fisherman were repeatedly following the coasts up Asia and Siberia and over into Alaska and Canada down to Washington and Oregon. Can be absolutely certain that Native Americans were also doing the same.

    It is interesting to note that South American Natives have 100% 0 Blood Type. 0 Blood isn’t found at that rate anywhere in the world. North American Natives are at about 80-90% (same as African rates for 0). European Scientists claim A was the first and then O and then B but this is impossible. A is a nordic type (predominant there). Also O can donate to A and B but only receive from other O’s which means O must be the original type. The problem is that B is an Indo-Slavic type, A is Nordic and 0 is found at 100% in South America. This means Native Americans had to be in the Americas before A and B came along and the Siberian Migration story can’t be true because if it were there would be A and B Native Americans in South America.

    Reply
  3. shawnsinyard@yahoo.com'

    I remember reading a Hopi tradition about how there was a red-headed tribe out in the southwest and also a man with a farm found a Roman sword with a dragon engraved on it and thought it was fake because of the Dragon… people have been floating all over this planet for nearly six thousand years.. just like Cherokee DNA could have been from the ptolemaic era of Egyptians Trading cocaine and tobacco and their descendants could have stayed here you know

    Reply
    • Well, the Cherokees carry a lot of Iberian and Eastern Anatolian DNA, which is exactly what the Sephardic Jews have. Despite what they say now, I can show you French maps as late as 1707 that don’t even mention the Cherokees and have the Shawnee and Creeks being the only Indians in Western North Carolina.

      Reply

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to POOF via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this website and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 463 other subscribers

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Share this post with your friends!