The Secret History of Tennessee, Dolly Parton and Jenifer Lopez
Everything that you ever wanted to know about the word, Tennessee, but were afraid to ask!
The origin of the word Tennessee generally varies with who you are talking with. Tourism agencies and school districts in East Tennessee tell folks it is a Cherokee word, because they get casino money from the Eastern Band of Cherokees . . . but they don’t know what it means. Descendants of Tennessee Yuchi’s say it is a Yuchi word, but don’t know what it means. As will be read below, academicians quibble a bit about its etymology, because they really don’t know either . . . that’s because they typically don’t know diddlysquat about the indigenous languages of the Southeast. The folks in Tennessee are about to get a REAL surprise.
Celebrities, Dolly Parton and Jenefer Lopez have far more in common than they could possibly realize. After taking a DNA test for a TV program, Lopez discovered that she is essentially a Taino Indian. They are a branch of the Arawaks. Since then Jenifer frequently wears “Indian style” costumes for her stage performances. It is has been found that at least 70% of Puertoricans carry significant Taino ancestry. That is why their senoritas dominate beauty pageants around the world.
Dolly Parton claims to be part Cherokee. She grew up on the Pigeon River in Sevier County, Tennessee. That region was last claimed by the Cherokees until white settlers moved in. Besides Cherokee casinos pay Dolly very well for displaying her talents. A few years ago Dolly stated at a performance attended by Cherokee Nation Principal Chief, Chad Smith: “Which part of me do you think looks Cherokee?” Dolly’s skull and body proportions are definitely indigenous American, but her actual indigenous ancestry is not what she thinks.
What an anonymous academician tells us in Wikipedia
“The earliest variant of the name that became Tennessee was recorded by Captain Juan Pardo, the Spanish explorer, when he and his men passed through an American Indian village named “Tanasqui” in 1567 while traveling inland from South Carolina. In the early 18th century, British traders encountered a Cherokee town named Tanasi (or “Tanase”) in present-day Monroe County, Tennessee. The town was located on a river of the same name (now known as the Little Tennessee River), and appears on maps as early as 1725. It is not known whether this was the same town as the one encountered by Juan Pardo, although recent research suggests that Pardo’s “Tanasqui” was located at the confluence of the Pigeon River and the French Broad River, near modern Newport.”
“The meaning and origin of the word are uncertain. Some accounts suggest it is a Cherokee modification of an earlier Yuchi word. It has been said to mean “meeting place”, “winding river”, or “river of the great bend”. According to James Mooney, the name “cannot be analyzed” and its meaning is lost.”
Sra. Lopez, you can now say “Caca de toro!”
Unraveling a mystery
Mr. Mooney, weren’t you one of the self-styled scholars at the Smithsonian of the late 1800s, who also said the the original version of the Creek Migration Legend was lost forever? Methinks that y’all were wrong on both matters.
First of all . . . “qui” is the Muskogee-Creek suffix for “people.” “Si” or “see” is a suffix used by all Muskogean languages, which means “descendants of.” So Tennessee and North Carolina academicians can now permanently forget the “Cherokee origin thing.”
When the 18 Muskogean scholars and professionals started the People of One Fire 10 years ago, we represented the general frustration among indigenous Southeastern tribes that the folks, who called themselves “Specialists in Southeastern Anthropology” really weren’t anthropologists, but rather classifiers of potsherds and stone implements with English names. In fact, they knew very little about the people, who made those artifacts prior to the arrival of Europeans. Language, architecture, cultural history, geographical origins and in the case of the Creeks, writing systems, are key elements of true anthropology.
The true history of Eastern Tennessee was one of the biggest enigmas. Sixteenth and seventeenth century maps showed most of Tennessee occupied by provinces, whose names could be translated today by a Creek or Chickasaw dictionary. There was no mention of the Cherokees on any map until 1715. The 1715 map showed “Charakeys” living in the extreme northeastern tip of the state. The rest of Eastern Tennessee was then occupied by Chickasaws, Creeks, Uchees and tribes, whose names disappeared soon afterward. These lost tribes had names that could not be translated by Muskogean, Maya or Cherokee dictionaries.
Until the late 1780s, the official name of the Tennessee River was the Callimaco River. It’s an Itza Maya word meaning “House or Palace of the King.” The upper section of the Tennessee River, between its confluence with Little Tennessee River and the confluence of the French Broad and Holston Rivers, several names. The Spanish called it the Coçate (Kusa People ~ Upper Creeks). The French called this section the Cusate (same word as Coçate), Hogeloge (Yuchi) or Caskinampo (Many Warriors in the Koasati language). The English originally called this section the Cusatee until the mid-1720s, when they started using the name, Hogelogee. However, the 1725 John Herbert map noted that the Cherokees called all of the river from beginning to end, the Callimaco. For about two decades this section alternatively was called the Cherokee River, but after the Cherokees changed sides in the French and Indian War, the word “Cherokee” was deleted from all maps. Most or all the river became named the Callimaco , while some maps labeled the upper section, the Hogelogee. The word, Tenasee was only used in South Carolina. It was how English speaking frontiersmen heard the Creek word Taenasi.
The original name of the Little Tennessee River was the Tulasi or Talasee River. This are Creek words that mean the occupants were descendants of E-Tula (an Itza Maya word) or Etowah Mounds. Early British maps named the Little Tennessee in the Great Smoky Mountains the Tellico River (from Talikoa ~ Tali People in Arawak) and the upper portions of the Little Tennessee River, the Tanasi. What is now named the Tellico River was then named either the Satikoa River (Colonists in Southern Arawak) or the Little Tellico River. English-speaking frontiersmen changed the word Satikoa to Citico.
When in 1790, the future state of Tennessee was incorporated into the Southwest Territory, its new federally appointed administrators did not like the names of many of the rivers. Apparently, the persons who made the decision to change the Calimaco River’s name, were from South Carolina. They used an odd spelling of Tenasee, first written by a British-appointed governor.
The legend goes that a Cherokee conjurer visited the Governor of the Southwestern Territory to warn him that the spirits that rose up his sacred fire gave a frightening warning. Under no circumstances should the new state be named after its principal river, unless the name of the Calimaco River was changed. Otherwise, things would go very badly for some Southeastern archaeologists and the Cherokees themselves two centuries into the future. This alliance of the Cherokees and archaeologists were destined to form a political organization called “Maya Myth-busting in the Mountains.” It would become a public relations disaster when the public found out that a river, which begins in the Tennessee and Georgia Mountains then flows through much of Tennessee actually had a Maya name! Heaven forbid, if some of the professors involved taught at the University of Calimaco!
In May 2013, POOF member Marilyn Rae found a forgotten book, published in French in 1658, at the Brown University Library. Marilyn has an exceptional background in Renaissance Period languages and history. The book had two chapters on the Native peoples of Georgia, based on an expedition in 1653 by Richard Briggstock. The author, French ethnologist Charles de Rochefort, stated that the mountains of western North Carolina and eastern Tennessee had formerly been densely occupied by Arawaks. They had been mostly replaced by peoples from the south (Itza Mayas). However, there were still some Arawak villages in what is now called the Great Smoky and Unaka Mountains of those states. We eventually realized that the untranslatable ethnic names in Northeast Tennessee were all Panoan and Arawak words from South America. Now THAT put in a different spin on the Southeast’s past.
The root word of Tanasqui, Tanasi, Tenasee, etc. still remained an enigma. They seemed to be Europeanized versions of the original Creek words. The use of “Ta” or “Te” flipflopped for 250 years, until institutionalized by the name of the new State of Tennessee in 1796. However, neither Tana nor Tena had any meaning in a Creek dictionary. We were at a roadblock. It was a Creek ethnic name, but we didn’t know its full meaning.
A big breakthrough occurred when Joseph Creel of Fort Payne, AL, George Mathews of Atlanta and Professor Gene Waddell, retired from the College of Charleston, donated an immense collection of maps and map books to the People of One Fire. We now have a collection of Colonial Era maps that exceeds most university libraries . . . including some rare maps that are not even in the Library of Congress.
On some early South Carolina maps, I noticed a tribe named the Taenasi or Taenasaw in the Blue Ridge Foothills, north of present day Greenville, SC. I saw the same ethnic name on the Pigeon and Little Tennessee Rivers in western North Carolina and Tennessee. The same tribe was also located on the Lower Tennessee River, where the French called them the Taensa. In the late 1700s, the Muskogee Creeks called this branch the Taensaw or Tensaw, when they moved to Southwestern Alabama. Taenasi means “Descendants of the Taino” in Itsate (Hitchiti) Creek. Taensaw means “Taina People” in the language of the 18th century Muskogee Creeks. Obviously, Tanasqui was how the 16th century Spaniards wrote down the Muskogee-Creek word Taenasi-ke. Where Dolly Parton grew up had originally been Taino territory.
Three beautiful women
Take a close look at the photos above of Jennifer Lopez, Dolly Parton and Carrie Underwood. Ignore the dyed blond hair on the latter two ladies and the darker complexion on Jennifer from being mostly Native American! Carrie Underwood is a citizen of the Muskogee-Creek Nation. Many Creeks carry significant DNA from the Paino and Arawak Peoples of South America. The three women have similar body proportions and Native American skulls. However, if you compare closely every detail of Jennifer Lopez’s and Dolly Parton’s faces, you will see that the two singers are almost identical. Perhaps Dolly should invite her cousin Jennifer down to Dollywood for an old fashion Taino barbicoa!
Now you know!
Latest posts by Richard Thornton (see all)
- Teotihuacan’s suburbs at ground level - February 14, 2019
- Professor say the darndest things! . . . Parte Trois - February 12, 2019
- Traveling back in time along the Unicoi Trail - February 12, 2019
- Protection and documentation of Native American heritage sites - February 11, 2019
- Snapshot: Creek cousin in the audience - February 7, 2019