Was There a Cultural Connection between South Ohio and South Florida?
Over 2000 years ago, a new population showed up in southeastern Ohio. When they arrived used to be placed at around 1000 BC. The most recent articles by archaeologists are now saying around 500 BC. Their physical features were virtually identical to those people, who had been building large mounds and platform villages in northern Louisiana and very different from the indigenous peoples, who probably were the ancestors of the Algonquians. They were of medium height, stocky build and had brachycephalic (broad-headed) skulls. Anthropologists have labeled these newcomers, the Adena Culture, after the Adena Estate in Ohio where one of their larger mounds is located.
Back many moons ago in college, I was taught that the big Adena Mounds were built around 800-500 BC and that the official end date for the Adena Culture was 200 BC. Those dates have remained consistent until just recently when several Adena Culture mounds were radiocarbon dated. These tests have dated Adena mounds right at the supposed end of their existence or even later. Also, back in my college days, the Introduction to Anthropology professor told us that the Adena Mounds were the oldest mounds in North America. It is now known that the Native folks in Louisiana built Watson Brake around 3400 BC.
Most of the Adena earthworks are cone-shaped mounds, surrounded by either circular ditches or a combination of circular ditches and earth berms. The Adena Culture is also known for engraving stone tablets with Mesoamerican type glyphs on them. However, many people are not convinced that the tablets were made by the same people, who built the Adena mounds.
In January 2014, archaeologists announced that THE Adena Mound was constructed around 100 B.C. to A.D. 40. Did Adena ghosts build this mound? The Mount Horeb Mound in Kentucky has recently been radiocarbon dated to around 0 AD. In his announcement of the radiocarbon date, Professor William Jeffries stated that the Adena People arrived in the Ohio Valley around 500 BC. His article did not say when the culture ceased to exist.
There have been more shocks to the world of archaeology in the past two years. Louisiana archaeologist, Dr. Joe Saunders, has dated large conical mounds in the northeastern part of his state to around 2400 BC. That’s correct. Adena type mounds were being built in Louisiana 2400 years before THE Adena Mound was built.
Poverty Point was abandoned around 500 BC. This is also the abandonment date for most Olmec Culture sites in southern Mexico. When the newcomers to Ohio began constructing earthworks, their public architecture was very different than the platform villages and effigy mounds associated with the Poverty Point Culture. It is unlikely that they traveled directly from Poverty Point, Louisiana to Adena, Ohio. The Native People in northern Louisiana built conical mounds between in the period between 3400 BC and 1600 BC. There is a huge chronological hiatus between the cessation of conical mound-building there and the appearance of conical mounds in southern Ohio.
Last year, Ohio archaeologist, William Romain, led a team of scientists in an effort to obtain a reliable radiocarbon date for the Great Serpent Mound in southeast Ohio1. Radiocarbon dating of multiple virgin earth samples, containing charcoal, provided a probable construction date of 381 B.C. – 44 B.C. Originally, the Great Serpent Mound had been dated to around 800-700 BC. Then around 20 years ago, Ohio archaeologists changed the date to around 1070 AD or slightly later. That’s the official Wikipedia date still.
Dr. Romain’s web site associates the Great Serpent Mound with the Adena People, because of the chronological alignment. From an architect’s perspective . . . coming from a profession that tries to understand how people live. . . I don’t think so. I strongly suspect that the same people, who carved the “Adena” tablets, built the Serpent Mound. If the Adena People built one animal effigy mound, why didn’t they build many more? Also, why did they wait about 300 years to build much simpler conical mounds?
By the way, I have the highest regard for Bill Romain’s work. His books sit on a shelf by this computer.
This is a game changer. From reading the professional literature, I can find no evidence that the archaeology profession is aware of how these radically different construction dates will affect their orthodoxy. Many anthropology professors around North America are still using the old 3000 BP (before the present) to 2200 BP dating for Adena Culture . . . perhaps in hopes that just like the Mayas in Georgia, the radiocarbon dates will just be forgotten, if they don’t talk about them.
Moving on down to the Sunshine State
In 2002, there was a brief rash of newspaper articles around the country about the 500+ acre Ortona Archaeological Zone on the southern edge of Glades County, Florida, near Lake Okeechobee. A team of archaeologists from two universities in southern Florida had studied the Ortona site and stumbled upon a regional network of canals with locks and raised earthen causeways that interconnected most of Southern Florida. In these articles, chief archaeologist, Robert Carr, described ponds and mounds in the shape of Mississippian Culture scepters – which themselves are the shape of the ceremonial scepters carried by Maya Hene Ahau (Sun Lords.) The Mississippian Culture symbols were built in Ortona, about 4-500 years before they appeared elsewhere in the Southeast. The Mississippian Culture was obviously not the Mississippian Culture, but began as the Lake Okeechobee Culture.
Robert Carr made a mistake. He dared to suggest that the massive regional transportation system and use of Maya cultural symbols reflected a direct influence from the Maya civilization. He was immediately non-personed by his peers. The only technical articles that you will read about Ortona are in the People of One Fire. The National Park Service’s Southeastern Archaeological Center in Tallahassee claimed to have never heard of the Ortona site. Florida’s deacon of archaeology literally cussed me out when I sent him an email, asking for information on Ortona. When the People of One Fire could find no published archaeological report on Ortona, one of our founding members literally drove around south Florida, until he could obtain the archaeological report and site plan of Ortona from Bob Carr . . . which professional journals refused to publish.
There is much more to the Lake Okeechobee Culture. Ortona was just one of many large towns in the region, and one of the later arrivals. The people around Lake Okeechobee were building conical mound by around 1000 BC and by 500 BC, building circular earthworks, plus conical mounds surrounded by circular earthworks. Primitive maize (corn) pollen as old as 600 BC was found in the Fort Center Archaeological Zone in northern Glades County. A large U-shaped Chontal Maya-style ball court was built east of a pond that is the shape of a Maya Sun Lord scepter. To the south is a crescent shaped temple mound that is identical to the temple mounds built by Chontal Mayas to the goddess, Ixchel.
The Ortona Archaeological Zone also contains a Great Serpent Mound with an earthen egg in its mouth. Robert Carr estimated that it was built around 300 AD, but that was a speculation. Carr never had sufficient time and funds to search for charcoal in the mound from which could be obtained a radiocarbon date for the Florida Serpent Mound. The twisting Florida Serpent Mound is equally as large as its Ohio cousin. However, it was built out of a sandy soil that has been eroded by centuries of hurricanes and tropical storms.
Since the Lake Okeechobee People were building very sophisticated earthworks as early as 500 BC, they were quite capable or erecting such a structure two more centuries before the time span now associated with the Ohio Serpent Mound.
I have been unable to find any archaeological report, which discusses forensic or DNA analysis of the skeletal remains around Lake Okeechobee. Numerous Native American skeletons have been found in Lake Okeechobee, but they have received very little professional analysis. The anthropology departments at FSU and the University of Florida seem to be generally disinterested in the advanced culture that once existed in the southern part of their peninsula. Nevertheless, a comparative study of Adena skeletons and Okeechobee skeletons could potentially provide some fascinating information.
The traditions of the Shawnee and Creek Peoples are that in the “old days” they regularly traveled to each other’s territory to worship at religious shrines, trade exotic goods, find mates and party. It is no inconceivable that a band of people from the Lake Okeechobee region could have migrated northward along this existing trade network until they settled in southern Ohio.
Have a great week and enjoy to crisp autumn air.
Latest posts by Richard Thornton (see all)
- What is the difference between Coweta, Cohutta and Kaweta? - June 18, 2018
- Native American appointed special prosecutor to bust crime in Georgia - June 16, 2018
- Archaeologist Arthur Kelly found Paracus-style skulls on Etowah River - June 13, 2018
- Downtown Cancun, Mexico in August 1970 - June 12, 2018
- My color slides survived eight years in an oven . . . but there was another surprise that made me weep! - June 10, 2018